question about genetics

Franks_Geckos

Leopard Gecko Addict
Messages
1,208
Location
NJ
You guys really have too much time on your hands. Why don't you just use the Advanced Genetics Wizard at http://www.geneticswizard.com/ ?
Anyone with even a little genetics knowledge can eventually make a punnet square work, but only a true lazy "Master of the Odds" breeder can estimate their chances without having to think. Now, if everyone will stop pretending to be genetics professors for a moment, I think I will go pretend to study the finer points of the 6.25 % chance of hatching a double recessive from 100% double hets. Peace.
 

Jeff876533

Jeffrayy
Messages
132
ok i also might buy one from www.lllreptile.com. i asked him if it was a certain percent het or was it 100% het. he replied: They are either blizzard, or not blizzard :) het for blizzard is pretty worthless these days. These are blizzard, and pictured at the website :)

so this means theyre 100% het for blizzard, right? im almost positive, just making sure
 

gko reptiles

A New Generation
Messages
679
Location
Orlando
Sounds like they are actual blizzards; not het for blizzard! (Hence, "het for blizzard is pretty worthless these days")

Anyway, to clear up what you asked in your previous post...

When something is 66% POSSIBLE het for anything, that means that the leo looks normal, but it is possibly a het; the name that they give this type of leo is where the "66% het" comes in. Now, if you do end up breeding it and get an albino (we're back to the albino example) then you know for sure that it is a het. In other words, once you figure out that it is a het for albino, you know that it is 100% het. To reinstate my point, a 66% het may or maynot be a het (there is that 66% chance), but, once you know that it is a het for albino, then you know that it does carry the recessive albino gene. A leo is either het, or it isn't. The 66% just means that it COULD carry the gene that you're looking for; but this also means that it could not. :)
 
T

TripleMoonsExotic

Guest
Franks_Geckos said:
You guys really have too much time on your hands. Why don't you just use the Advanced Genetics Wizard at http://www.geneticswizard.com/ ?
Anyone with even a little genetics knowledge can eventually make a punnet square work, but only a true lazy "Master of the Odds" breeder can estimate their chances without having to think.

Because some of us don't NEED a genetics wizard to figure out simple genetics. ;)

ok i also might buy one from www.lllreptile.com. i asked him if it was a certain percent het or was it 100% het. he replied: They are either blizzard, or not blizzard het for blizzard is pretty worthless these days. These are blizzard, and pictured at the website

so this means theyre 100% het for blizzard, right? im almost positive, just making sure

Sounds like they're telling you the ARE Blizzards, not hets.
 
T

TripleMoonsExotic

Guest
PaulSage said:
Okay, you guys even have me second guessing myself! :main_laugh:

The father of the gecko in question is a Blizzard het for Albino (looks like a blizzard, but carries the albino gene). The mom is a double het for blizzard and albino (she looks normal, but carries both traits).

I whipped up a Punnet square for the breeding. The possible alleles that the male can pass on are in blue, the female's in pink. A "visual" blizzard, such as the one in question, is highlighted in yellow.

AabbXAaBb.jpg


Now, this is where Paul gets a little confused. :) IF we weren't dealing with a double-recessive cross, I buy the 66% term. However, since it is theoretically possible for a visual blizzard to also be a visual albino from this pairing, we can eliminate one of the potential outcomes since the blizzard in question is not a "blazing" (the "aabb" one in the bottom corner). So, instead of having the 2/3 or 66%, we have 5/7 or 71%. Right?

I remember the 71% stat from a genetics class I had taken, but since I've never heard it mentioned in reptile genetics, I just go with the flow. lol I could very well be off my rocker though, it has been a rather spastic week...

Your image is gone, so I don't know what your PS looked like...

But how I figure out double recessive is by pulling it all apart.
________________________

Blizzard x het Blizzard
=
Blizzards
&
Normals 100% het Blizzard
[Thus all non-Blizzard offspring will be 100% het Blizzard]

het Albino x het Albino
=
Albinos
&
66% het Albino
[Thus all non-Albino offspring will be 66% het Albino)
________________________

37.5% Blizzards 66% Albino
37.5% Normals 100% Blizzard 66% het Albino
12.5% Albinos 100% het Blizzard
12.5% Blazing Blizzards
 
Last edited by a moderator:

nwheat

New Member
Messages
2,690
Location
Central California
If you are interested in learning more about genetics, and enjoying playing around on the computer, and perhaps dragons, try this! This is what I use to teach genetics in my college level biology courses, although it was originally set up for middle & high school classes. Try it, it's fun (oh, and educational, too!).
 

Visit our friends

Top